Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

Appeal A-Z Guarantee Claim – Buyer Received item

📧 Subject: Urgent Appeal – A-to-Z Claim Wrongly Granted (Order #701-1965834-0585062)

Dear Amazon Executive Seller Support,

I am writing to urgently appeal the decision made on an A-to-Z Guarantee Claim for Order #701-1965834-0585062, which we believe was wrongly granted in favor of the buyer despite strong and verifiable evidence of successful delivery.

Amazon tends to side with the buyer when there's a dispute involving non-receipt, even if tracking shows delivery with a signature. This is because they prioritize the customer experience and often lean toward "buyer protection."

In many cases, automated systems make the initial decision, especially when tracking shows delivery but the buyer claims non-receipt. If that conflict is detected, the decision might be fast-tracked in favor of the buyer.

We are a professional and long-standing seller on Amazon and take customer satisfaction seriously. However, in this case, the claim appears to have been approved without a full and fair review of the facts.

📌 Summary of the Situation:

Order shipped with signature required via [CanPar].

Tracking confirms delivery with a signature at the correct address.

We conducted a thorough investigation:

Opened a trace with the courier, who provided GPS data confirming delivery at the buyer's address.

Communicated proactively with the buyer and requested they check with household members.

Buyer claimed no one signed for the package, then mentioned a doorbell camera. We requested footage, but they refused to provide it and instead filed an A-to-Z claim.

We submitted all of this documentation and communication history to Amazon during the A-to-Z appeal process.

Despite this, the claim was granted to the buyer within seconds, which strongly suggests no human review of our evidence occurred.

🛑 Our Request:

We respectfully request:

A manual re-evaluation of this A-to-Z claim.

A review of the evidence we submitted, including GPS delivery proof, courier confirmation, and buyer correspondence.

Restoration of the funds, or at minimum, a detailed explanation of how this claim was evaluated and on what grounds it was approved.

📎 Attachments (include the following):

Tracking with signature confirmation.

Courier's GPS confirmation.

Screenshot or copy of the courier’s investigation result.

We are committed to providing a great experience to Amazon customers, but sellers must also be protected from false or unsupported claims. If orders shipped with signature and GPS-confirmed delivery are not defensible under the A-to-Z program, we respectfully ask for clarification of what Amazon considers "proof of delivery" in such situations.

img

Thank you for your time and for reviewing this issue fairly.

imgimg
7 views
2 replies
Tags:A-to-z claims
10
Reply
user profile
Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

Appeal A-Z Guarantee Claim – Buyer Received item

📧 Subject: Urgent Appeal – A-to-Z Claim Wrongly Granted (Order #701-1965834-0585062)

Dear Amazon Executive Seller Support,

I am writing to urgently appeal the decision made on an A-to-Z Guarantee Claim for Order #701-1965834-0585062, which we believe was wrongly granted in favor of the buyer despite strong and verifiable evidence of successful delivery.

Amazon tends to side with the buyer when there's a dispute involving non-receipt, even if tracking shows delivery with a signature. This is because they prioritize the customer experience and often lean toward "buyer protection."

In many cases, automated systems make the initial decision, especially when tracking shows delivery but the buyer claims non-receipt. If that conflict is detected, the decision might be fast-tracked in favor of the buyer.

We are a professional and long-standing seller on Amazon and take customer satisfaction seriously. However, in this case, the claim appears to have been approved without a full and fair review of the facts.

📌 Summary of the Situation:

Order shipped with signature required via [CanPar].

Tracking confirms delivery with a signature at the correct address.

We conducted a thorough investigation:

Opened a trace with the courier, who provided GPS data confirming delivery at the buyer's address.

Communicated proactively with the buyer and requested they check with household members.

Buyer claimed no one signed for the package, then mentioned a doorbell camera. We requested footage, but they refused to provide it and instead filed an A-to-Z claim.

We submitted all of this documentation and communication history to Amazon during the A-to-Z appeal process.

Despite this, the claim was granted to the buyer within seconds, which strongly suggests no human review of our evidence occurred.

🛑 Our Request:

We respectfully request:

A manual re-evaluation of this A-to-Z claim.

A review of the evidence we submitted, including GPS delivery proof, courier confirmation, and buyer correspondence.

Restoration of the funds, or at minimum, a detailed explanation of how this claim was evaluated and on what grounds it was approved.

📎 Attachments (include the following):

Tracking with signature confirmation.

Courier's GPS confirmation.

Screenshot or copy of the courier’s investigation result.

We are committed to providing a great experience to Amazon customers, but sellers must also be protected from false or unsupported claims. If orders shipped with signature and GPS-confirmed delivery are not defensible under the A-to-Z program, we respectfully ask for clarification of what Amazon considers "proof of delivery" in such situations.

img

Thank you for your time and for reviewing this issue fairly.

imgimg
Tags:A-to-z claims
10
7 views
2 replies
Reply
0 replies
user profile
Christine_Amazon

Hello @Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

Christine here from Amazon Forums.

I will bring your case to the team in charge, for them to review it.

Please know that while I can escalate your case internally, I can not guarantee any outcome.

As soon as I have more information, I will contact you through here.

Hope you have a great day!

Christine.

10
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

Appeal A-Z Guarantee Claim – Buyer Received item

📧 Subject: Urgent Appeal – A-to-Z Claim Wrongly Granted (Order #701-1965834-0585062)

Dear Amazon Executive Seller Support,

I am writing to urgently appeal the decision made on an A-to-Z Guarantee Claim for Order #701-1965834-0585062, which we believe was wrongly granted in favor of the buyer despite strong and verifiable evidence of successful delivery.

Amazon tends to side with the buyer when there's a dispute involving non-receipt, even if tracking shows delivery with a signature. This is because they prioritize the customer experience and often lean toward "buyer protection."

In many cases, automated systems make the initial decision, especially when tracking shows delivery but the buyer claims non-receipt. If that conflict is detected, the decision might be fast-tracked in favor of the buyer.

We are a professional and long-standing seller on Amazon and take customer satisfaction seriously. However, in this case, the claim appears to have been approved without a full and fair review of the facts.

📌 Summary of the Situation:

Order shipped with signature required via [CanPar].

Tracking confirms delivery with a signature at the correct address.

We conducted a thorough investigation:

Opened a trace with the courier, who provided GPS data confirming delivery at the buyer's address.

Communicated proactively with the buyer and requested they check with household members.

Buyer claimed no one signed for the package, then mentioned a doorbell camera. We requested footage, but they refused to provide it and instead filed an A-to-Z claim.

We submitted all of this documentation and communication history to Amazon during the A-to-Z appeal process.

Despite this, the claim was granted to the buyer within seconds, which strongly suggests no human review of our evidence occurred.

🛑 Our Request:

We respectfully request:

A manual re-evaluation of this A-to-Z claim.

A review of the evidence we submitted, including GPS delivery proof, courier confirmation, and buyer correspondence.

Restoration of the funds, or at minimum, a detailed explanation of how this claim was evaluated and on what grounds it was approved.

📎 Attachments (include the following):

Tracking with signature confirmation.

Courier's GPS confirmation.

Screenshot or copy of the courier’s investigation result.

We are committed to providing a great experience to Amazon customers, but sellers must also be protected from false or unsupported claims. If orders shipped with signature and GPS-confirmed delivery are not defensible under the A-to-Z program, we respectfully ask for clarification of what Amazon considers "proof of delivery" in such situations.

img

Thank you for your time and for reviewing this issue fairly.

imgimg
7 views
2 replies
Tags:A-to-z claims
10
Reply
user profile
Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

Appeal A-Z Guarantee Claim – Buyer Received item

📧 Subject: Urgent Appeal – A-to-Z Claim Wrongly Granted (Order #701-1965834-0585062)

Dear Amazon Executive Seller Support,

I am writing to urgently appeal the decision made on an A-to-Z Guarantee Claim for Order #701-1965834-0585062, which we believe was wrongly granted in favor of the buyer despite strong and verifiable evidence of successful delivery.

Amazon tends to side with the buyer when there's a dispute involving non-receipt, even if tracking shows delivery with a signature. This is because they prioritize the customer experience and often lean toward "buyer protection."

In many cases, automated systems make the initial decision, especially when tracking shows delivery but the buyer claims non-receipt. If that conflict is detected, the decision might be fast-tracked in favor of the buyer.

We are a professional and long-standing seller on Amazon and take customer satisfaction seriously. However, in this case, the claim appears to have been approved without a full and fair review of the facts.

📌 Summary of the Situation:

Order shipped with signature required via [CanPar].

Tracking confirms delivery with a signature at the correct address.

We conducted a thorough investigation:

Opened a trace with the courier, who provided GPS data confirming delivery at the buyer's address.

Communicated proactively with the buyer and requested they check with household members.

Buyer claimed no one signed for the package, then mentioned a doorbell camera. We requested footage, but they refused to provide it and instead filed an A-to-Z claim.

We submitted all of this documentation and communication history to Amazon during the A-to-Z appeal process.

Despite this, the claim was granted to the buyer within seconds, which strongly suggests no human review of our evidence occurred.

🛑 Our Request:

We respectfully request:

A manual re-evaluation of this A-to-Z claim.

A review of the evidence we submitted, including GPS delivery proof, courier confirmation, and buyer correspondence.

Restoration of the funds, or at minimum, a detailed explanation of how this claim was evaluated and on what grounds it was approved.

📎 Attachments (include the following):

Tracking with signature confirmation.

Courier's GPS confirmation.

Screenshot or copy of the courier’s investigation result.

We are committed to providing a great experience to Amazon customers, but sellers must also be protected from false or unsupported claims. If orders shipped with signature and GPS-confirmed delivery are not defensible under the A-to-Z program, we respectfully ask for clarification of what Amazon considers "proof of delivery" in such situations.

img

Thank you for your time and for reviewing this issue fairly.

imgimg
Tags:A-to-z claims
10
7 views
2 replies
Reply
user profile

Appeal A-Z Guarantee Claim – Buyer Received item

by Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

📧 Subject: Urgent Appeal – A-to-Z Claim Wrongly Granted (Order #701-1965834-0585062)

Dear Amazon Executive Seller Support,

I am writing to urgently appeal the decision made on an A-to-Z Guarantee Claim for Order #701-1965834-0585062, which we believe was wrongly granted in favor of the buyer despite strong and verifiable evidence of successful delivery.

Amazon tends to side with the buyer when there's a dispute involving non-receipt, even if tracking shows delivery with a signature. This is because they prioritize the customer experience and often lean toward "buyer protection."

In many cases, automated systems make the initial decision, especially when tracking shows delivery but the buyer claims non-receipt. If that conflict is detected, the decision might be fast-tracked in favor of the buyer.

We are a professional and long-standing seller on Amazon and take customer satisfaction seriously. However, in this case, the claim appears to have been approved without a full and fair review of the facts.

📌 Summary of the Situation:

Order shipped with signature required via [CanPar].

Tracking confirms delivery with a signature at the correct address.

We conducted a thorough investigation:

Opened a trace with the courier, who provided GPS data confirming delivery at the buyer's address.

Communicated proactively with the buyer and requested they check with household members.

Buyer claimed no one signed for the package, then mentioned a doorbell camera. We requested footage, but they refused to provide it and instead filed an A-to-Z claim.

We submitted all of this documentation and communication history to Amazon during the A-to-Z appeal process.

Despite this, the claim was granted to the buyer within seconds, which strongly suggests no human review of our evidence occurred.

🛑 Our Request:

We respectfully request:

A manual re-evaluation of this A-to-Z claim.

A review of the evidence we submitted, including GPS delivery proof, courier confirmation, and buyer correspondence.

Restoration of the funds, or at minimum, a detailed explanation of how this claim was evaluated and on what grounds it was approved.

📎 Attachments (include the following):

Tracking with signature confirmation.

Courier's GPS confirmation.

Screenshot or copy of the courier’s investigation result.

We are committed to providing a great experience to Amazon customers, but sellers must also be protected from false or unsupported claims. If orders shipped with signature and GPS-confirmed delivery are not defensible under the A-to-Z program, we respectfully ask for clarification of what Amazon considers "proof of delivery" in such situations.

img

Thank you for your time and for reviewing this issue fairly.

imgimg
Tags:A-to-z claims
10
7 views
2 replies
Reply
0 replies
0 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
Christine_Amazon

Hello @Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

Christine here from Amazon Forums.

I will bring your case to the team in charge, for them to review it.

Please know that while I can escalate your case internally, I can not guarantee any outcome.

As soon as I have more information, I will contact you through here.

Hope you have a great day!

Christine.

10
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Christine_Amazon

Hello @Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

Christine here from Amazon Forums.

I will bring your case to the team in charge, for them to review it.

Please know that while I can escalate your case internally, I can not guarantee any outcome.

As soon as I have more information, I will contact you through here.

Hope you have a great day!

Christine.

10
user profile
Christine_Amazon

Hello @Seller_OrOuoLC3AZ9u9

Christine here from Amazon Forums.

I will bring your case to the team in charge, for them to review it.

Please know that while I can escalate your case internally, I can not guarantee any outcome.

As soon as I have more information, I will contact you through here.

Hope you have a great day!

Christine.

10
Reply
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity