Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo

[Urgent Appeal] Unfair A-to-Z Claim Ruling: Buyer Received Refund Without Returning Item, Violating Section 4 of the A-to-Z Policy

Problem Overview

On July 23, 2025, Amazon mistakenly approved an A-to-z claim (order number 702-6113361-5821027) for which the buyer did not return the item but received a full refund. This ruling violates Amazon policy and contradicts the initial rejection decision on July 20. We request a re-review.

Key Fact Timeline

Return Approval

2025-06-12 23:17: Buyer submitted a return request

Same day: We approved the request immediately and automatically sent a return label (backend records available for verification)

Evidence of Buyer's Breach

Return Window Period (45 days): The buyer never shipped the package

Logistics verification: No carrier pickup records (logistics provider proof available)

Our compliant operations

Three email reminders to return the item (2025-06-15/06-25/07-10), with the final reminder explicitly stating:

“Refunds will be processed within 48 hours of receiving the returned item. Please ensure you use the attached label to return the product.”

Amazon's contradictory ruling

2025-07-20 01:17: Amazon rejected the claim (reason: buyer did not return the item)

2025-07-23 00:42: Suddenly approved the claim, claiming “item did not meet expectations or seller's return issue”

Policy Basis and Decision Errors

▶️ Violation of Policy Terms

According to Section 4 of the A-to-z Guarantee Policy:

“Buyers must return the item to receive a refund”

The buyer failed to fulfill the return obligation, and the seller is not liable for a refund.

▶️ Erroneous ruling logic

Regarding “item not as expected”: The buyer provided no physical evidence throughout the process.

Regarding “seller's return issue”: We promptly approved the return and provided a label.

Request Amazon staff assistance

Revoke the claim approval for order 702-6113361-5821027

Refund the deduction and remove the account performance defect record

Provide specific grounds for reversing this ruling

Evidence that can be verified immediately

Backend path: Performance > A-to-z Claims > This Order > Communication Records

Return approval timestamp: 2025-06-12 23:17

Three follow-up emails requesting return

Logistics evidence: Backend return status still displays “Waiting for buyer to return”

@Daryl_Amazon @Ricardo_Amazon @Christine_Amazon@Ricardo_Amazon

@Lucre_Amzn

@Daryl_Amazon

102 views
7 replies
Tags:A-to-z claims
20
Reply
user profile
Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo

[Urgent Appeal] Unfair A-to-Z Claim Ruling: Buyer Received Refund Without Returning Item, Violating Section 4 of the A-to-Z Policy

Problem Overview

On July 23, 2025, Amazon mistakenly approved an A-to-z claim (order number 702-6113361-5821027) for which the buyer did not return the item but received a full refund. This ruling violates Amazon policy and contradicts the initial rejection decision on July 20. We request a re-review.

Key Fact Timeline

Return Approval

2025-06-12 23:17: Buyer submitted a return request

Same day: We approved the request immediately and automatically sent a return label (backend records available for verification)

Evidence of Buyer's Breach

Return Window Period (45 days): The buyer never shipped the package

Logistics verification: No carrier pickup records (logistics provider proof available)

Our compliant operations

Three email reminders to return the item (2025-06-15/06-25/07-10), with the final reminder explicitly stating:

“Refunds will be processed within 48 hours of receiving the returned item. Please ensure you use the attached label to return the product.”

Amazon's contradictory ruling

2025-07-20 01:17: Amazon rejected the claim (reason: buyer did not return the item)

2025-07-23 00:42: Suddenly approved the claim, claiming “item did not meet expectations or seller's return issue”

Policy Basis and Decision Errors

▶️ Violation of Policy Terms

According to Section 4 of the A-to-z Guarantee Policy:

“Buyers must return the item to receive a refund”

The buyer failed to fulfill the return obligation, and the seller is not liable for a refund.

▶️ Erroneous ruling logic

Regarding “item not as expected”: The buyer provided no physical evidence throughout the process.

Regarding “seller's return issue”: We promptly approved the return and provided a label.

Request Amazon staff assistance

Revoke the claim approval for order 702-6113361-5821027

Refund the deduction and remove the account performance defect record

Provide specific grounds for reversing this ruling

Evidence that can be verified immediately

Backend path: Performance > A-to-z Claims > This Order > Communication Records

Return approval timestamp: 2025-06-12 23:17

Three follow-up emails requesting return

Logistics evidence: Backend return status still displays “Waiting for buyer to return”

@Daryl_Amazon @Ricardo_Amazon @Christine_Amazon@Ricardo_Amazon

@Lucre_Amzn

@Daryl_Amazon

Tags:A-to-z claims
20
102 views
7 replies
Reply
7 replies
user profile
Josh_Amazon

Hello @Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo,

I understand the situation you are experiencing with your order and the A to Z claim. Thank you so much for providing all the information and the order ID. I have reviewed the case and I was able to gather the necessary details to escalate this to our internal team.

Please wait with me until I get a response from them so I can get back to you soon with an update. In the meantime, please refrain from creating new cases related to this same issue.

Kind regards,

-Josh

01
user profile
Seller_YraW9QTnsGOSZ

This same issue happened to me just last week. Amazon approved a refund without authorizing the customer to refund the product.

20
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo

[Urgent Appeal] Unfair A-to-Z Claim Ruling: Buyer Received Refund Without Returning Item, Violating Section 4 of the A-to-Z Policy

Problem Overview

On July 23, 2025, Amazon mistakenly approved an A-to-z claim (order number 702-6113361-5821027) for which the buyer did not return the item but received a full refund. This ruling violates Amazon policy and contradicts the initial rejection decision on July 20. We request a re-review.

Key Fact Timeline

Return Approval

2025-06-12 23:17: Buyer submitted a return request

Same day: We approved the request immediately and automatically sent a return label (backend records available for verification)

Evidence of Buyer's Breach

Return Window Period (45 days): The buyer never shipped the package

Logistics verification: No carrier pickup records (logistics provider proof available)

Our compliant operations

Three email reminders to return the item (2025-06-15/06-25/07-10), with the final reminder explicitly stating:

“Refunds will be processed within 48 hours of receiving the returned item. Please ensure you use the attached label to return the product.”

Amazon's contradictory ruling

2025-07-20 01:17: Amazon rejected the claim (reason: buyer did not return the item)

2025-07-23 00:42: Suddenly approved the claim, claiming “item did not meet expectations or seller's return issue”

Policy Basis and Decision Errors

▶️ Violation of Policy Terms

According to Section 4 of the A-to-z Guarantee Policy:

“Buyers must return the item to receive a refund”

The buyer failed to fulfill the return obligation, and the seller is not liable for a refund.

▶️ Erroneous ruling logic

Regarding “item not as expected”: The buyer provided no physical evidence throughout the process.

Regarding “seller's return issue”: We promptly approved the return and provided a label.

Request Amazon staff assistance

Revoke the claim approval for order 702-6113361-5821027

Refund the deduction and remove the account performance defect record

Provide specific grounds for reversing this ruling

Evidence that can be verified immediately

Backend path: Performance > A-to-z Claims > This Order > Communication Records

Return approval timestamp: 2025-06-12 23:17

Three follow-up emails requesting return

Logistics evidence: Backend return status still displays “Waiting for buyer to return”

@Daryl_Amazon @Ricardo_Amazon @Christine_Amazon@Ricardo_Amazon

@Lucre_Amzn

@Daryl_Amazon

102 views
7 replies
Tags:A-to-z claims
20
Reply
user profile
Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo

[Urgent Appeal] Unfair A-to-Z Claim Ruling: Buyer Received Refund Without Returning Item, Violating Section 4 of the A-to-Z Policy

Problem Overview

On July 23, 2025, Amazon mistakenly approved an A-to-z claim (order number 702-6113361-5821027) for which the buyer did not return the item but received a full refund. This ruling violates Amazon policy and contradicts the initial rejection decision on July 20. We request a re-review.

Key Fact Timeline

Return Approval

2025-06-12 23:17: Buyer submitted a return request

Same day: We approved the request immediately and automatically sent a return label (backend records available for verification)

Evidence of Buyer's Breach

Return Window Period (45 days): The buyer never shipped the package

Logistics verification: No carrier pickup records (logistics provider proof available)

Our compliant operations

Three email reminders to return the item (2025-06-15/06-25/07-10), with the final reminder explicitly stating:

“Refunds will be processed within 48 hours of receiving the returned item. Please ensure you use the attached label to return the product.”

Amazon's contradictory ruling

2025-07-20 01:17: Amazon rejected the claim (reason: buyer did not return the item)

2025-07-23 00:42: Suddenly approved the claim, claiming “item did not meet expectations or seller's return issue”

Policy Basis and Decision Errors

▶️ Violation of Policy Terms

According to Section 4 of the A-to-z Guarantee Policy:

“Buyers must return the item to receive a refund”

The buyer failed to fulfill the return obligation, and the seller is not liable for a refund.

▶️ Erroneous ruling logic

Regarding “item not as expected”: The buyer provided no physical evidence throughout the process.

Regarding “seller's return issue”: We promptly approved the return and provided a label.

Request Amazon staff assistance

Revoke the claim approval for order 702-6113361-5821027

Refund the deduction and remove the account performance defect record

Provide specific grounds for reversing this ruling

Evidence that can be verified immediately

Backend path: Performance > A-to-z Claims > This Order > Communication Records

Return approval timestamp: 2025-06-12 23:17

Three follow-up emails requesting return

Logistics evidence: Backend return status still displays “Waiting for buyer to return”

@Daryl_Amazon @Ricardo_Amazon @Christine_Amazon@Ricardo_Amazon

@Lucre_Amzn

@Daryl_Amazon

Tags:A-to-z claims
20
102 views
7 replies
Reply
user profile

[Urgent Appeal] Unfair A-to-Z Claim Ruling: Buyer Received Refund Without Returning Item, Violating Section 4 of the A-to-Z Policy

by Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo

Problem Overview

On July 23, 2025, Amazon mistakenly approved an A-to-z claim (order number 702-6113361-5821027) for which the buyer did not return the item but received a full refund. This ruling violates Amazon policy and contradicts the initial rejection decision on July 20. We request a re-review.

Key Fact Timeline

Return Approval

2025-06-12 23:17: Buyer submitted a return request

Same day: We approved the request immediately and automatically sent a return label (backend records available for verification)

Evidence of Buyer's Breach

Return Window Period (45 days): The buyer never shipped the package

Logistics verification: No carrier pickup records (logistics provider proof available)

Our compliant operations

Three email reminders to return the item (2025-06-15/06-25/07-10), with the final reminder explicitly stating:

“Refunds will be processed within 48 hours of receiving the returned item. Please ensure you use the attached label to return the product.”

Amazon's contradictory ruling

2025-07-20 01:17: Amazon rejected the claim (reason: buyer did not return the item)

2025-07-23 00:42: Suddenly approved the claim, claiming “item did not meet expectations or seller's return issue”

Policy Basis and Decision Errors

▶️ Violation of Policy Terms

According to Section 4 of the A-to-z Guarantee Policy:

“Buyers must return the item to receive a refund”

The buyer failed to fulfill the return obligation, and the seller is not liable for a refund.

▶️ Erroneous ruling logic

Regarding “item not as expected”: The buyer provided no physical evidence throughout the process.

Regarding “seller's return issue”: We promptly approved the return and provided a label.

Request Amazon staff assistance

Revoke the claim approval for order 702-6113361-5821027

Refund the deduction and remove the account performance defect record

Provide specific grounds for reversing this ruling

Evidence that can be verified immediately

Backend path: Performance > A-to-z Claims > This Order > Communication Records

Return approval timestamp: 2025-06-12 23:17

Three follow-up emails requesting return

Logistics evidence: Backend return status still displays “Waiting for buyer to return”

@Daryl_Amazon @Ricardo_Amazon @Christine_Amazon@Ricardo_Amazon

@Lucre_Amzn

@Daryl_Amazon

Tags:A-to-z claims
20
102 views
7 replies
Reply
7 replies
7 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
Josh_Amazon

Hello @Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo,

I understand the situation you are experiencing with your order and the A to Z claim. Thank you so much for providing all the information and the order ID. I have reviewed the case and I was able to gather the necessary details to escalate this to our internal team.

Please wait with me until I get a response from them so I can get back to you soon with an update. In the meantime, please refrain from creating new cases related to this same issue.

Kind regards,

-Josh

01
user profile
Seller_YraW9QTnsGOSZ

This same issue happened to me just last week. Amazon approved a refund without authorizing the customer to refund the product.

20
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Josh_Amazon

Hello @Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo,

I understand the situation you are experiencing with your order and the A to Z claim. Thank you so much for providing all the information and the order ID. I have reviewed the case and I was able to gather the necessary details to escalate this to our internal team.

Please wait with me until I get a response from them so I can get back to you soon with an update. In the meantime, please refrain from creating new cases related to this same issue.

Kind regards,

-Josh

01
user profile
Josh_Amazon

Hello @Seller_LtCxu1GTO9roo,

I understand the situation you are experiencing with your order and the A to Z claim. Thank you so much for providing all the information and the order ID. I have reviewed the case and I was able to gather the necessary details to escalate this to our internal team.

Please wait with me until I get a response from them so I can get back to you soon with an update. In the meantime, please refrain from creating new cases related to this same issue.

Kind regards,

-Josh

01
Reply
user profile
Seller_YraW9QTnsGOSZ

This same issue happened to me just last week. Amazon approved a refund without authorizing the customer to refund the product.

20
user profile
Seller_YraW9QTnsGOSZ

This same issue happened to me just last week. Amazon approved a refund without authorizing the customer to refund the product.

20
Reply
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity