1) Enforce buyers to leave seller feedback on every single order.

By doing so, not only to reflect the TRUE performance of a seller, but also make it fair for seller so scammers whom threatened to leave negative feedbacks even due to their own faults would have less damages to sellers.

Not sure if it was my selling product category only having extremely LOW rates of buyers making a feedback even on perfect orders (my competitors are the same), but I can tell that "Request a Review" built-in function won't work at all. We are all having orders (not very little amount though), but just no feedback received.

Buyers knew how to make a feedback, especially when they had any disagreement to the seller. But having buyers to give you a "good" feedback is almost like mission impossible.

2) Why would seller needed to provide evidences to support our statements when defending A-to-Z claims, when buyers do not need to?

Such as Opened and Used returns are subjected to restocking fees, which was clearly given by Amazon's Refund policy. However, if fees are deducted from refunds, and buyer then filed A-to-Z claim, without proofs to support product returned was indeed opened/used, A-to-Z will just fully refund the order, maybe not counting ODR (sometimes allowed to deduct fees but counting ODR). All depending whether the claim was processed by a robot, A.I. or human. Not standard at all and to mention not following most policies at most times.

3) Why would it "MUST BE" sellers' fault when reason of return = DEFECTIVE, DAMAGED, PERFORMANCE OR QUALITY NOT ADEQUATE? It was all discussed over various forums that people are using those reason of returns to get a free return shipping label without any difficulties. Most ridiculously, Amazon never asked for their proof to those reason of return, but just let buyers spoil the return policy.

Buyers (particularly Amazon's, less happened on other marketplaces) are simply treating sellers as a library, FREE RENTAL, FREE TRRIAL, FREE RETURN. Why? Because such consumer practices were planted by Amazon over the years, people knew how easily to abuse return policy without penalty.

Just like the most recent "extended holiday return period", buyers are requesting to return orders even after more than 2 months of use with reason such as "not comfortable with product" or "don't like it". Does it make sense at all to the purpose of "extending" return period that is enabling people to intentionally abuse the use of it?

I really wish Government of Canada would be able to, for example, implement a 25% tariff like transaction fees on every single order placed on Amazon.ca (same to all American retailers doing businesses in Canada), as a revenge to President Trump's 25% tariff on our exported products to the states.

Canadians should then shop with Canadian companies (or any Canadian company could start a new marketplace) if disagreeing with the 25% price extra shopping with American companies.