Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM

Forum Post: Appeal Denial for Amygdalin (B17) Cases 17585483431 & 17585563841

I’m baffled that Amazon insists apricot-derived ingredients are “impossible to process” to remove amygdalin, despite a signed letter from the manufacturer explaining exactly how they eliminate B17. Here’s what they’re ignoring:

Certified Processing Protocol

Steaming/Light Stir-Frying: Apricot seeds/kernels are first steamed or gently heated to soften the skin.

Tip & Skin Removal: The hard seed tips and skins—where amygdalin concentrates—are mechanically removed.

Result: This combination of heat and physical removal eradicates amygdalin, as confirmed by the manufacturer’s letter on official Kan Herbs letterhead.

Manufacturer’s Own Letter

The owner of the herb supplier detailed this exact process in a signed, dated letter, affirming that no B17 remains after these steps.

I’ve uploaded high-resolution photos of that letter under each ASIN so your team can verify it directly.

Amazon’s Willful Denial

Despite this unambiguous, on-record evidence, Amazon refuses to acknowledge the letter or reevaluate the case.

This isn’t a debate over science—it’s blatant disregard for the manufacturer’s documented, step-by-step toxin-removal procedure.

Moderators, please intervene. My appeal submits the official processing letter; there is zero amygdalin left in these products. Enforce a fair review with this critical document in hand.

43 views
5 replies
Tags:Product compliance, Product safety
00
Reply
user profile
Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM

Forum Post: Appeal Denial for Amygdalin (B17) Cases 17585483431 & 17585563841

I’m baffled that Amazon insists apricot-derived ingredients are “impossible to process” to remove amygdalin, despite a signed letter from the manufacturer explaining exactly how they eliminate B17. Here’s what they’re ignoring:

Certified Processing Protocol

Steaming/Light Stir-Frying: Apricot seeds/kernels are first steamed or gently heated to soften the skin.

Tip & Skin Removal: The hard seed tips and skins—where amygdalin concentrates—are mechanically removed.

Result: This combination of heat and physical removal eradicates amygdalin, as confirmed by the manufacturer’s letter on official Kan Herbs letterhead.

Manufacturer’s Own Letter

The owner of the herb supplier detailed this exact process in a signed, dated letter, affirming that no B17 remains after these steps.

I’ve uploaded high-resolution photos of that letter under each ASIN so your team can verify it directly.

Amazon’s Willful Denial

Despite this unambiguous, on-record evidence, Amazon refuses to acknowledge the letter or reevaluate the case.

This isn’t a debate over science—it’s blatant disregard for the manufacturer’s documented, step-by-step toxin-removal procedure.

Moderators, please intervene. My appeal submits the official processing letter; there is zero amygdalin left in these products. Enforce a fair review with this critical document in hand.

Tags:Product compliance, Product safety
00
43 views
5 replies
Reply
5 replies
user profile
Glenn_Amazon

Hello @Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM,

I'm currently looking in to your cases with the escalation team. It may be that some of these ingredients (regardless of specific treatment) are not permitted to be sold on Amazon.com, however I'm looking to get this fully investigated. Once I have any details I will reach out to you here. Thank you for your understanding.

-Glenn

00
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM

Forum Post: Appeal Denial for Amygdalin (B17) Cases 17585483431 & 17585563841

I’m baffled that Amazon insists apricot-derived ingredients are “impossible to process” to remove amygdalin, despite a signed letter from the manufacturer explaining exactly how they eliminate B17. Here’s what they’re ignoring:

Certified Processing Protocol

Steaming/Light Stir-Frying: Apricot seeds/kernels are first steamed or gently heated to soften the skin.

Tip & Skin Removal: The hard seed tips and skins—where amygdalin concentrates—are mechanically removed.

Result: This combination of heat and physical removal eradicates amygdalin, as confirmed by the manufacturer’s letter on official Kan Herbs letterhead.

Manufacturer’s Own Letter

The owner of the herb supplier detailed this exact process in a signed, dated letter, affirming that no B17 remains after these steps.

I’ve uploaded high-resolution photos of that letter under each ASIN so your team can verify it directly.

Amazon’s Willful Denial

Despite this unambiguous, on-record evidence, Amazon refuses to acknowledge the letter or reevaluate the case.

This isn’t a debate over science—it’s blatant disregard for the manufacturer’s documented, step-by-step toxin-removal procedure.

Moderators, please intervene. My appeal submits the official processing letter; there is zero amygdalin left in these products. Enforce a fair review with this critical document in hand.

43 views
5 replies
Tags:Product compliance, Product safety
00
Reply
user profile
Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM

Forum Post: Appeal Denial for Amygdalin (B17) Cases 17585483431 & 17585563841

I’m baffled that Amazon insists apricot-derived ingredients are “impossible to process” to remove amygdalin, despite a signed letter from the manufacturer explaining exactly how they eliminate B17. Here’s what they’re ignoring:

Certified Processing Protocol

Steaming/Light Stir-Frying: Apricot seeds/kernels are first steamed or gently heated to soften the skin.

Tip & Skin Removal: The hard seed tips and skins—where amygdalin concentrates—are mechanically removed.

Result: This combination of heat and physical removal eradicates amygdalin, as confirmed by the manufacturer’s letter on official Kan Herbs letterhead.

Manufacturer’s Own Letter

The owner of the herb supplier detailed this exact process in a signed, dated letter, affirming that no B17 remains after these steps.

I’ve uploaded high-resolution photos of that letter under each ASIN so your team can verify it directly.

Amazon’s Willful Denial

Despite this unambiguous, on-record evidence, Amazon refuses to acknowledge the letter or reevaluate the case.

This isn’t a debate over science—it’s blatant disregard for the manufacturer’s documented, step-by-step toxin-removal procedure.

Moderators, please intervene. My appeal submits the official processing letter; there is zero amygdalin left in these products. Enforce a fair review with this critical document in hand.

Tags:Product compliance, Product safety
00
43 views
5 replies
Reply
user profile

Forum Post: Appeal Denial for Amygdalin (B17) Cases 17585483431 & 17585563841

by Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM

I’m baffled that Amazon insists apricot-derived ingredients are “impossible to process” to remove amygdalin, despite a signed letter from the manufacturer explaining exactly how they eliminate B17. Here’s what they’re ignoring:

Certified Processing Protocol

Steaming/Light Stir-Frying: Apricot seeds/kernels are first steamed or gently heated to soften the skin.

Tip & Skin Removal: The hard seed tips and skins—where amygdalin concentrates—are mechanically removed.

Result: This combination of heat and physical removal eradicates amygdalin, as confirmed by the manufacturer’s letter on official Kan Herbs letterhead.

Manufacturer’s Own Letter

The owner of the herb supplier detailed this exact process in a signed, dated letter, affirming that no B17 remains after these steps.

I’ve uploaded high-resolution photos of that letter under each ASIN so your team can verify it directly.

Amazon’s Willful Denial

Despite this unambiguous, on-record evidence, Amazon refuses to acknowledge the letter or reevaluate the case.

This isn’t a debate over science—it’s blatant disregard for the manufacturer’s documented, step-by-step toxin-removal procedure.

Moderators, please intervene. My appeal submits the official processing letter; there is zero amygdalin left in these products. Enforce a fair review with this critical document in hand.

Tags:Product compliance, Product safety
00
43 views
5 replies
Reply
5 replies
5 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
Glenn_Amazon

Hello @Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM,

I'm currently looking in to your cases with the escalation team. It may be that some of these ingredients (regardless of specific treatment) are not permitted to be sold on Amazon.com, however I'm looking to get this fully investigated. Once I have any details I will reach out to you here. Thank you for your understanding.

-Glenn

00
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Glenn_Amazon

Hello @Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM,

I'm currently looking in to your cases with the escalation team. It may be that some of these ingredients (regardless of specific treatment) are not permitted to be sold on Amazon.com, however I'm looking to get this fully investigated. Once I have any details I will reach out to you here. Thank you for your understanding.

-Glenn

00
user profile
Glenn_Amazon

Hello @Seller_Lu3bFSNnS57zM,

I'm currently looking in to your cases with the escalation team. It may be that some of these ingredients (regardless of specific treatment) are not permitted to be sold on Amazon.com, however I'm looking to get this fully investigated. Once I have any details I will reach out to you here. Thank you for your understanding.

-Glenn

00
Reply
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity